The specialists are lead to the position in accordance with its qualification (art. 64), being able to be pedagogos with formation in educational orientation or course of after-graduation, that is, for the force of the law we are all professors in lower court and later we are called to act our specialty in accordance with, and only believe that thus he must be so that let us can assume our responsibility in the pedagogical questions of the school as being part of our function, and not cairmos in the temptation to deviate our performance for the fields of Psychology and of the Social Assistance, confusion common good in the practical one of the Educational Orientation of some professionals that they are acting has time more and they do not make the reading of this reflexiva pedagogical source of the linking with the questions biggest of the education properly said, what he is explicit in speaks of Grinspun (2006) on what the Educational Person who orientates is not in terms of professional formation: (…) Afirmo that Educational the Orienting professional belongs to the group of the teaching and not to another group that acts (or not) in the schools, even so its work, in determined moment, if relates (or even though if it bases), as for example, in Psychology, Sociology, the Administration, the Social Service etc. Therefore, the Educational Person who orientates is not Clinical or Pertaining to school Psychologist; it is not Psicopedagogo; she is not Social Assistant; also is not administrative technician; another category does not belong to any that is not part of what we call to be the field of the teaching. Being, therefore, the objective of this study to pontuar the presence of the Educational Orientation in the school under the light of the legislation and, more specifically, to ressignificar the practical one of the Educational Person who orientates, from adjusted formation, so that this if becomes a basic partner in the improvement of the process teach-learning.